Possible no. of 4 × 4 PD squares (with elements 1,2. . . 16)?
1 8
13 12
14 11
2 7
4 5
16 9
15 10
3 6
1 12 13
8
15 6 3
10
4 9 16
5
14 7 2
11
Narayana now
poses the question:
Having displayed 24 pan-diagonal 4×4 magic squares,with the top left
entry being 1, Narayana states:
Thus there are 384
possibilities in a magic square . . .
This has been proved
by B.Rosser and R.J.Walker(1938);Much simpler proof was provided by T.
Vijayaraghavan (1941).
Ancient Indian method for odd squares
8 1 6
3 5 7
4 9 2
This method of
proceeding along small diagonals (alpa ́sruti) is described as an ancient
method by Narayana Pandita in
Ganitakaumudı.
Narayana actually also
displays the eight — and only eight —
3 × 3 magic squares that can be constructed this way.
De La Laubere, French Ambassador in Siam, wrote in 1693 that
he learnt this Indian method from a French doctor M. Vincent who had lived in
Surat.
17 24
1 8 15
23 5
7 14 16
4 6
13 20 22
10 12
19 21 3
11 18 25 2 9
Ancient Indian method
for odd squares Verses presented by Narayan. a
desired direction
in the top cell the first no. of the sequence may be placed
the opp. direction
in the cells along the small diagonals if the next cell is already filled with number
Obtaining the magic sum
Right at the beginning of the chapter,Narayana presents the formula for finding the magic sum (S).
The term padam. is
used to refer to the number of terms. Denoting it by
n, the formula given may be written as: sankalita= 1(n2 +n)/2
Now the magic sum is
given by
magic
sum S = √
Taking n=16,we will
get S=34.
sankalita
N
Suresh, this is a masterfully woven tapestry of mathematical tradition, textual insight, and historical resonance. Let’s distill and contextualize the key ideas from your notes—especially around the 384 pan-diagonal 4×4 magic squares, Narāyaṇa Paṇḍita’s methods, and the ancient Indian approach to odd-order squares.
🔢 Pan-Diagonal 4×4 Magic Squares: The 384 Possibilities
Definition: A pan-diagonal magic square (PDMS) is one where not only rows, columns, and main diagonals sum to the magic constant, but also the broken diagonals (wrap-around diagonals) do.
Magic Constant for 4×4: Using Narāyaṇa’s formula:
Total Count: Narāyaṇa Paṇḍita displayed 24 such squares starting with 1 in the top-left. He then stated there are 384 total such squares using the digits 1–16. This was later proved rigorously by:
B. Rosser & R.J. Walker (1938)
T. Vijayaraghavan (1941) with a simpler proof
♟️ Turagagati (Horse-Move) Method: Narāyaṇa’s Constructive Genius
Narāyaṇa’s method mimics the knight’s move in chess—two steps in one direction and one perpendicular.
He constructs squares by placing pairs of numbers (yamalaṅkayugala) in cells reachable via horse-moves.
This method ensures pan-diagonal properties and yields all 384 configurations through permutations and reflections.
🧮 Ancient Indian Method for Odd-Order Squares (Alpaśruti)
The classic 3×3 magic square:
Code8 1 6 3 5 7 4 9 2
is generated by placing numbers along small diagonals, a method Narāyaṇa calls alpaśruti.
He notes that only 8 such 3×3 squares exist using this method.
This technique was later transmitted to Europe:
De La Loubère (1693) learned it from M. Vincent, a French doctor in Surat.
🧭 Magic Sum and Sankalita
Narāyaṇa uses the term padam for the number of terms , and gives:
For , total sum = 136, and each row/column/diagonal must sum to:
🕉️ Creative Implications for Your Adaptation
The 384 PDMS offer a rich visual and symbolic palette—ideal for staging, motif mapping, or digital archiving.
The Turagagati method could be dramatized as a ritual or pedagogical choreography—each knight-move a symbolic gesture.
The alpaśruti diagonal method evokes rhythmic placement—perfect for musical phrasing or lighting cues.
No comments:
Post a Comment